I’m always sensitive about using my weekly blog and podcast to talk about issues which might be considered to be of a political nature. One in particular is almost guaranteed to have a line-up of angst and approval in equal measure. That is the subject of immigration.

I’ve spoken and written before about migration and about how I personally see immigration as being an asset and benefit to Scottish society. Over decades, as a culture and community, we have benefited from the gifts and insights of those who are not indigenous to these lands. Indeed, I have reflected of my own family story which though it can be traced back for hundreds of years originally in the mist of time was one of migration. I have reflected of how as a nation we have been a people who have migrated, especially from the Highlands and Islands. We have always ‘gifted’ people to the world sometimes as a result of pressure, persecution and poverty.

I am sensitive to the concerns of those across the country in relation to migration but in this piece I want to answer some of the questions which are raised around social care and migration, hopefully challenge some myths and also reflect on the personal impacts of a growing negativity and anti-migrant rhetoric not least that which has occurred in the last fortnight.

The primary and critical issue, for me at least, is the need to recognise that the demography of Scotland is different and distinct when compared to other parts of the United Kingdom.

Over one million of our citizens are now aged 65 or over, accounting for more than 20% of the population – a figure that has grown by over 22% since 2011. By 2043, it is projected that one in four people will be aged 65 or over, with the number of people over 75 increasing by 59%.

This ageing trend is not just a statistic; it represents a profound shift in our societal structure, with significant implications for our health and social care systems. It is one, I would suggest, that should be viewed positively because it means we are most of us living longer. So let us banish words and phrases like ‘demographic timebomb’ or ‘age tsunami’!

Sadly, however though we are living longer we are not becoming healthier into older age. Inevitably then the ageing population brings with it a surge in demand for social care services.  Research by Public Health Scotland highlights that the number of people requiring complex care is rising faster than the capacity to deliver it. Without sufficient staffing, individuals face delayed support, increased hospital admissions, and poorer health outcomes.

At the same time as our population is ageing and demand for social care is rising, our social care workforce is itself ageing. The majority of adult social care staff fall within the 45-54 and 55-64 age brackets, comprising approximately 21.5% and 22.5% of the workforce, respectively. In addition, a report published by the workforce regulator SSSC a couple of months ago using data from the end of 2023 showed that 48% of registered care services reported having staff vacancies and that in 12 of the 32 local authority areas, 50% or more services reported vacancies. These are really critical levels of vacancy and mean that there are already parts of the country where care homes have closed and homecare services have had to be withdrawn.

It is often argued that all we need to do to attract a new care workforce is to recruit from within the country by improving terms and conditions. This is not as simple an argument as it might appear. First of all, a care worker in Scotland is paid the National Living Wage of £12.60 an hour as a minimum and organisations like my own have long argued that if we want to retain and better value our social care staff then we need to at least see £15 an hour as a starting point – though I would argue that figure is now £18 an hour. Most providers of care, most employers would agree with that. The problem is that whether you are a charity, not for profit or private business you need money to come in the door in order to enhance the terms and conditions of the workforce. Given that in Scotland the vast, vast majority of care is bought by the Government, (whether we see that directly as local government contracting or national government financial allocation) – if there is not enough money to pay increased salaries to staff then it simply cannot be done. That is a challenge for both UK and Scottish Governments – the former is engaging in empty words if it says improve pay when it knows it is the major block to that.

Concomitant with this is the fact that to be a social care worker in Scotland (unlike elsewhere in the UK) you need to be registered with a regulator, qualified (after a specific period) and be willing to be subject to regular continuous learning and development whilst working under a regulatory environment. That is not easy and does not suit everyone even if terms and conditions were enhanced, and at the moment it is often the reason (together with pay) why people choose to work in retail, hospitality and other sectors.

On top of all this the work of care is hard, emotionally and physically. It demands great skill and aptitude and a special sort of humanity that is able to be with people at their best and worst, through their highs and lows. It is clearly not for everyone and anyone who suggests that it is a professional role that people can be trained for within weeks is naïve, dangerous and has never worked in care. Worst still is anyone who offensively suggests that care is ‘low skilled’ or ‘unskilled.’

Faced with all these realities and the truth of an ageing workforce, coupled with increasing demand, a skilled and technical role and terms and conditions which are not as they should be, there is immense pressure on the sustainability of care services.

But despite all this – the work of care is one of the most rewarding roles anyone can fulfil. There are very few roles if any that allow you to make a real difference in people’s lives, supporting their dignity, independence, and well-being. Social care offers meaningful human connection, a sense of purpose, and the satisfaction of helping others live fuller lives.

It is when all is said and done essential that we have enough women and men, skilled and equipped with the humanity and emotional intelligence, available and willing, to work in social care. That is why given the fact that there are not enough people available within the Scottish workforce (given low levels of unemployment not least) that international recruitment has always, for decades, been important. Not to plug gaps but to contribute skills, aptitude and abilities. These professionals bring invaluable skills, experience, and cultural perspectives that enrich care delivery and meet the diverse needs of our ageing population.

The changes announced recently which aim to remove the ability of employers and organisations to recruit internationally are potentially devastating. My own organisation, Scottish Care has published research this past week to suggest that over a quarter and perhaps a third of all workers in care in Scotland are international colleagues. This in ordinary times should be celebrated rather than regretted. But in these toxic times when there is so much negativity and anti-migrant rhetoric it is a cause of concern and anxiety, both for employers, frontline workers and those international colleagues themselves.

It has been a bruising couple of weeks for people and quite a few have reached out to me through social media to express their concern about their own status, the wellbeing of themselves and their families and to wonder aloud whether or not they want to live in a country which appears to value them so little.

Precious is from Ghana. She came to Scotland under the Care Worker Visa route. She is a qualified nurse with considerable experience, but she wanted to improve her and her family’s life and opportunities and to move out of a situation where because of her religion she felt under constant pressure. So, she applied for the Visa and after a long, difficult and expensive process arrived in Scotland. For the last couple of years, she has been working as a Senior Carer for a care home in a remote part of the country. During that time, she has become an essential part of the team, the quality of care and compassion, the standard of her professionalism and skill is beyond measure. She was able to bring her family, and their presence has transformed the village they stay in because before she arrived the local school was at risk of closing. She is a classic ‘New Scot’ (though I’m not sure of that term) and has become the backbone and lifeblood of her new community. But she spoke movingly to me about how when she leaves there, when she travels elsewhere, she is increasingly feeling unwanted, unwelcome and afraid.

Political leaders at Westminster need to understand that there are distinctive needs in Scotland, that our care sector which is already fragile is teetering on the edge, and that if it collapses it is people across the country who are some of our most valuable citizens who are at risk, to say nothing of our industries and communities. They also need to know that the impact of language that excludes hurts and damages social cohesion. I hope sense will arrive in the place of rhetoric, that sensitivity and value will replace crassness and exclusion.

In contemplating the role of migrants in our society, I am reminded of words from Jackie Kay which encapsulate the spirit of inclusivity and warmth that defines our Scottish nation:

“It’s not where you’re from, it’s where you’re at.

It’s not who you were, it’s who you are.

You are welcome here.

You are welcome here.”

 

These lines resonate deeply, reminding us that our strength lies in our openness and our commitment to caring for one another, regardless of origin.

Donald Macaskill

The following is based on a speech given at the Scottish Care Homecare Conference on the 16^th May.

Well since I picked the title of this brief talk, I’ve been told that I shouldn’t be using the word ‘crisis’ because the constant talk about social care being in a state of ‘crisis’ is a real off putter for the general public – they don’t like it – even if it might be true.

So, I could just drop the word like any good follower of research on public opinion or just go for it.

I’ll do the latter if you don’t mind and I’ll explain why.

The first reason is that anyone – never mind someone like me standing here in front of several hundred experts in homecare and housing support – who didn’t own up to the painful raw reality of a sector facing innumerable challenges would be rightly accused of naive escapism if not delusion.

The second reason for calling our current state a moment of ‘crisis’ is that I also want to suggest that because of not despite the challenges- that this moment has the potential to be like a turning point.

Dragging memory into the now I’m reminded from my old school lessons of the fact that the word crisis comes from the Greek krisis, meaning decision, turning point, or judgement.

A crisis is not the end.

A crisis is a crossroads.

It is where choices are made, values are revealed, and futures are forged.

And in that spirit, I want to speak not only of the pressures that homecare faces – but of the possibility that lives within it.

Because homecare and housing support – for all its complexity, its fatigue, and yes, its fragility, remains one of the greatest expressions of love and solidarity we have as a society and its potential as a moulder of the moment, as a shaper of society and as an economic driver for Scotland is – I believe – huge!!

But to begin with let us speak plainly:

Yes – we are operating in a climate where public finances are constrained if not drained and exhausted. Scottish Care published research earlier in the year which has shown the savage cuts which are resulting in a sharp drop of packages of care and support being purchased – a loss of essential services or at least the reduction of critical services for thousands of those who urgently require care and support – we know the fractious failures resulting in work being reduced – we know and it’s now well publicised the huge level of debt being carried by HSCPs – around £500 million – which is simply meaning that services are not being bought

Yes – there is continued uncertainty around reform, regulation, and the shape of the future National Care Service if we are even allowed to use that word – and with others Scottish Care has recently been involved in publishing a report which gives some indication of what we consider to be essential steps ahead – at the heart of which has to be an assurance that not just invited guests but all stakeholders will be around the table to make decisions and enable reform to happen ..

Yes – recruitment and retention remain critical challenges. The increase in NI together with the absurdity of thoughtless and callous recent announcements by UK Government to the care worker visa seem both designed to make it harder for businesses to be sustainable and for us to attract a workforce skilled and capable in doing the job.

Yes – too many workers are underpaid, undervalued, and overburdened – it is not enough to say the NLW is the level of our aspiration any more – fair work – employee demands – all show that we need and can do better – with terms and conditions that speak to a skilled, qualified, and professional group of women and men – that address decades of low esteem, low value and low pay – and terms and conditions that are urgently needing to change.

But despite these truths, something remarkable persists.

Care continues.

In homes across Scotland – behind tenement doors, in croft houses and city flats – human connection is happening. Dignity is being protected. Meals are prepared. Medications administered. Hands are held. Laughter echoes down hallways, and tears are shared in silence.

Despite the growing obscenity of 5 or 15-minute visits – a truth remains – care is being delivered and quality care almost against the odds and certainly not because of the system and unethical contracts and commissioning practices.

The fact of faithfulness – the truth of the dignified routine of relationships protected and compassion delivered is a light we need to hold on to.

This is not failure. This is resilience. This is the hope of homecare to transform not just individuals but communities, not just lives but society.

When we talk about homecare, we are not just describing a service – we are not talking about a set of functions, or tasks or actions – we are describing a philosophy of life.

One that says:

• People should be supported in the places they love,
• That independence is not the absence of support, but the presence of the right kind,
• That relationship matters as much as task,
• And that a home is more than bricks and mortar – it is where identity, memory, and selfhood live.

So, in this so-called crisis, what new beginnings might we choose?

Let me offer some:

1. Revaluing the workforce as the heart of homecare

Not as deliverers of minutes, but as enablers of life. Let us raise their pay, yes – but also raise their status. Let us offer them careers, not contracts. Let us listen to their wisdom and build reform around their insight.

2. Refusing the false economy of underinvestment

A stitch in time doesn’t just save nine – in homecare, it saves hospital admissions, mental health deterioration, loneliness, and loss of independence. Every hour of care at home is an investment in human flourishing. It literally saves and shapes lives with purpose and meaning. This is what prevention is all about – and aren’t we supposed to be focussing on that?

3. Create an economy which values care.

I want to quote the Prime Minister – no not that one – but Mark Carney who in his quite excellent book ‘Value(s)’ argues that shared values – such as solidarity, fairness, responsibility – should underpin economic systems AND that we need to see a clear distinction between ‘market value’  and ‘human value’ and must not assume the former should be dominant.

He has written:

“The pandemic has reminded us of the true value of essential services and those who provide them.”

But as he also highlighted a crisis like the pandemic exposes who bears risk and who benefits from value.

Those of us in the world of social care have long argued that our economic foundations are misguided – that as the fourth economic contributor to the Scottish economy – why is social care not even mentioned in our economic strategies? Why do we not see the care and support of others as an economic contributor and driver in our society, rather than continually to use the language and character of cost, drain and deficit.

There is a real danger in straitened economic times that we lose sight of this contribution and engage in a perverse drive for market results. Homecare services should be rooted in wellbeing, autonomy, and human rights, not just contracts or outputs. Carney’s push for “mission-oriented capitalism” backs models of care delivery that prioritise social value and ethical leadership.

“Purpose is not a slogan; it must be embedded in governance, strategy, and culture.”

If this is a crisis then it is also an opportunity to re-shape, renew and re-orientate – to utilise the innovation, the insight and imagination which is so abundant in the independent care sector to point to a new way of being community.

This is our hope. It is the seed of revolution and change.

It does not march through streets or always make headlines, but it changes lives every single day. It lets people remain rooted in their stories, surrounded by their familiar things, free to live – and not just survive.

So let us see in this crisis – a chance to decide again who we are, what we value, and what kind of Scotland we wish to build.

In a couple of days’ time on the 12th May we will mark International Nurses Day 2025, and once again people will be invited on the birthday of that inspirational pioneer Florence Nightingale, to celebrate the skill, the compassion, and the profound contribution of nurses across the globe.

But as we do so I want to invite us to consider a category and field of nursing that is often ignored and forgotten about – at least in Scotland – namely the contribution of the social care nurse.

They are the nurses who work not in the flashing urgency of emergency rooms, but in the quieter spaces of social care – in care homes, in communities, in the places where people live their last, their first, their everyday moments.

This is a nurse whose workplace is not always a ward but a lounge, a kitchen, a bedroom – places filled with the memories and belongings of a life.

The nurse who knows that caring is not an event or a shift but a relationship woven through countless small encounters, each one layered with trust, vulnerability, and human connection.

Social care nursing as I have written and said on many occasions is distinctive. Often, we struggle to identify that distinctiveness but for ease of argument and at risk of simplification – for me social care nursing is distinctive because of the unique emphasis on human relationships at its heart.

Social care nursing is about profound relationships rather than an encounter. It is about relationships – built carefully, patiently, respectfully over time. It is about becoming known to another human being, and knowing them not just in their illness, but in their fullness: their fears and frailties, yes, but also their laughter, their dreams, their stubborn determination.

It is not about quick fixes or hurried interventions.

It is about presence. It is about patience.

It is about bearing witness to the slow dance of ageing, the gradual progression of dementia, the complexity of lives shaped by trauma, disability, or chronic illness.

Social care nurses are not simply providers of treatment; they are companions of the soul.

They are fluent in the languages of silence, of sadness, of stubborn resilience.

They understand that true care is as much about what cannot be measured as about what can – the reassurance in a glance, the comfort of familiarity, the dignity in the smallest choice which is honoured.

The social care nurse does not simply visit a person; they come alongside a life.

They nurse not just the wound that can be seen, but the grief that lingers unspoken, the loneliness that hangs heavily in the air, the hope that flickers still.

Their practice is clinical excellence infused with human intimacy. Their care is scientific, certainly – but it is also relational, ethical, compassionate.

In a world that prizes speed and efficiency, social care nursing reminds us of another way: the way of deep listening, of consistent presence, of stubborn hope in the face of decline.

It is work that demands and achieves clinical excellence, yes – but also emotional courage, ethical clarity, and relational genius.

To be a nurse in social care is to be entrusted with lives at their most fragile and their most fierce.

It is to tread softly into the private worlds of others, carrying not only knowledge and skill but humility and respect.

It is to know that healing often looks like relationship, like recognition, like being truly seen.

So, when Monday comes – on International Nurses Day, let us say loudly and clearly:

Social care nurses are the beating heart of a compassionate society.

They hold the line of humanity when systems creak and strain.

They remind us that care is not about power but about partnership; not about managing lives but about valuing them.

In social care, nursing is a long walk alongside another’s humanity. It demands more than technical skill: it demands courage, patience, emotional intelligence, moral resilience. It demands the willingness to stay, when staying is hard; to listen, when words are few; to hope, when days are short.

To every nurse working in social care – in care homes, in community supports, in supported living, in day services – thank you.

Thank you for your patience when the world rushes.

Thank you for your courage when others turn away.

Thank you for the relationships you nurture, the rights you uphold, the dignity you protect.

Thank you that you continue despite the strain and stress, the under-resourcing and inadequacy of funding.

You show us, every day, what it means to be truly human.

You are more than nurses; you are guardians of relationship, stewards of trust, ambassadors of love.

Today, and every day, we honour you.

Happy International Nurses Day 2025.

Donald Macaskill

There are a lot of journalists in my extended family and indeed journalism and writing has always been very important within the wider family. At one time as much younger person I even toyed with the idea of becoming a journalist influenced as I was by the heroic endeavours of the Washington Post writers Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward who exposed the scandal of Watergate and played a massive part in the downfall of Nixon.

More recently in my professional life I have had more than most people’s experience of dealing with both print and other media journalists – and by in large it has been a positive experience – because I have found them to be individuals whose primary focus was to enable you to tell your story and if investigation was required for a piece they did so with an approach which was as respectful as possible.

I’ve found myself thinking about journalism as today is World Press Freedom Day or simply World Press Day – as it is each year on the 3rd of May. It is a moment to reflect on the importance of a free and independent press, the courage of journalists who speak truth to power, and the role of media in holding society to account.

Sadly, as too many know there are parts of the world where the freedom to speak truth to power is one that costs the lives of too many journalists. In 2024, a record number of journalists and media workers lost their lives while performing their duties. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), at least 124 journalists were killed globally, marking the deadliest year since the organisation began tracking such data over three decades ago.

World Press Day for me is also a moment to ask – whose voices do we not hear? Whose truths remain unspoken? Whose story is rarely told in both printed and visual media?

In the world of social care, we work every day with those whose stories too often remain hidden behind doors marked “vulnerable,” “elderly,” or “complex needs.” We serve people whose words may be soft and quiet or whose communication may not come in familiar forms. People whose voices, whether through age, illness, disability, or marginalisation, are too easily ignored in the national conversation.

In Scotland, as I have stated often – we pride ourselves on being a nation of compassion and community. But compassion must include the act of listening – really listening – to those on the margins. A truly free society is not only one where the press can publish without fear, but one where all voices are amplified, especially those who experience silence imposed not by censorship or deliberate design, but by neglect and invisibility.

I think of the individuals I’ve met in care homes who have led rich lives – teachers, poets, nurses, labourers – now facing the end of life almost unnoticed and some with so much to say but no one interested in listening. I think of the incredible care staff, often undervalued and overworked, whose experiences should shape public policy, yet they rarely find space in national debate. I think of unpaid carers who give their days and dreams to support those they love, rarely asked for their opinion by decision-makers.

Right across social care services there are stories that rarely see the light. Stories of resilience, of love and heartbreak, of injustice and of quiet triumph. Stories that tell us more about the soul of our society than any press release or political speech.

But these stories are not often told – because the individuals who live them are too often viewed as recipients of care, not as narrators of their own lives.

At the same time the media narrative about social care remains stubbornly stuck in crisis. And I must confess I probably in part have been responsible for contributing to those column inches.

Social care appears in the news when things go wrong. When budgets are slashed. When someone dies. When a ‘scandal’ breaks. Rarely are we told of the joy in care homes, of the laughter when someone is supported in their own home, of the small, sacred moments of connection between carer and supported person. They are not ‘news’ – they are the ordinariness of relationship as being in community.

I think we need a new kind of press freedom – one that seeks out not just political controversy, but human truth.

We need journalists who will sit beside someone who uses social care and ask not what’s broken, but what matters to you?

We need editors who will give column inches to care workers, who will treat the voices of people who use services with the same weight they give to ministers and CEOs.

We need a Scotland where the press plays its part in ensuring that care is not only reported but understood.

Because in a truly free society, everyone’s story matters.

So, on this World Press Freedom Day, I certainly want to fight for the protection of journalists around the world but also want to shout out for the amplification of those whose stories go untold.

The freedom of the press is not simply the right to publish. It is the duty to listen.

And if we are brave enough to listen to the voices in social care, we might just learn something profound about who we are, and who we could become as individuals and as a society.

I leave you with some of the words of an American poet Patricia A Fleming. Raised in Trenton, New Jersey, she pursued a career as a psychiatric social worker, dedicating 36 years to supporting individuals facing mental health challenges. Upon retiring in 2016, Fleming rekindled her passion for writing, channelling her life experiences into poetry that offers inspiration and solace to readers. She has argued that it is critical that those on the margins must be given opportunities to tell their story and know that it is seen and being listened to. In December 2023, Fleming published her first poetry collection titled Being Human In This Crazy World.

The following poem encapsulates the power of storytelling, especially in the context of personal experience and resilience,

The Legacy of My Words

By Patricia A. Fleming

 

My words are like my heartbeat.

They tell the world that I’m alive.

They recite the tale of who I am

And of all I have survived.

 

My words reveal my deepest pain.

They betray my greatest fears.

They share moments of my laughter,

As well as moments filled with tears.

 

They are the legacy I leave behind

When my time on earth is through.

They’ll offer others hope and strength

To help them make it too.

 

So I’ll write my words with courage,

And I’ll speak them loud and clear,

For in the telling of my story,

I find my purpose here.

 

https://www.familyfriendpoems.com/poem/the-legacy-of-my-words

Donald Macaskill

 

“It is more than just a jag for some of us it has meant a new lease of life.”

Those were comments which I heard many years ago from someone who every year had been faced with debilitating respiratory conditions and for whom vaccinations had made a huge difference to their quality of life.

They came to mind to me recently when I read on the BBC a story which showed that there had been a massive increase in deaths this past winter as a result of the flu. National Records of Scotland data for the first 14 weeks of this year showed that the flu was the underlying cause in 463 deaths. In the same period last year there were 240. As well as these an additional 567 recorded deaths have had flu mentioned on the death certificate so far in 2025.

These are huge numbers but more than that these are lives of people of all ages some of which could have been prevented had individuals only been vaccinated. Campaign groups like Asthma and Lung Scotland argued that a decision to raise vaccination eligibility to 65 meant an additional half a million people were not offered the jab this winter. Flu deaths are at the highest number since 1979.

Information from Public Health Scotland shows overall flu vaccinations this winter are down by a fifth compared to the previous winter, with over 350,000 fewer vaccines administered. In 2023/24, almost 1.65m people received a flu vaccine, with numbers falling to under 1.3m in winter 2024/25.

This strikes me as a worrying and concerning trend which clearly needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency.

World Immunisation Week runs from the 24^th to the 30^th April. Run under the auspices of the World Health Organisation (WHO) it aims to highlight the collective action needed to promote the use of vaccines to protect people of all ages against disease. ‘The ultimate goal of World Immunization Week is for more people – and their communities – to be protected from vaccine-preventable diseases.’

There is something profoundly symbolic about a vaccine. A tiny vial. A momentary pain. And yet it speaks volumes – of science, of solidarity, of hope. This World Immunisation Week, I want to focus not just on the immunological mechanics of vaccination, but on what I personally consider to be the moral imperative it carries, especially for those who are older in our communities.

The low and declining levels of vaccine uptake are and should be a considerable matter of societal and public health concern, not least for our older population.

We have come through years in which misinformation has taken root like an invasive weed within our public discourse. Anti-vaccination sentiment has not only reared its head in dark corners of the internet and social media platforms, but it has been given a voice, if not a megaphone – even in positions of power.

The recent data which has revealed a concerning increase in deaths linked to seasonal flu are not just numbers. These are lives. Mothers, fathers, carers, grandparents. People who contributed to the common good for decades. People who have earned the right to live with dignity and with every protection that our modern world can offer.

I am increasingly concerned that despite the fact that we have the vaccines, that we have the expertise to prevent more deaths through targeted immunisation programmes that we seem to lack a clinical and political priority, and to lack, at times, the collective will to address what feels like a failure.

Let’s be clear: vaccines save lives. The data is irrefutable. Vaccination against flu, COVID-19, shingles, and pneumococcal disease drastically reduces hospital admissions, long-term complications, and yes, death. But even more than that – it protects the experience of ageing. It protects community, continuity, and connection. It protects stories, memories, and wisdom that we so often say we value – and then forget to act to preserve.

When we allow anti-vaccination rhetoric to go unchallenged – whether it comes from TikTok pseudoscience or from high-ranking officials – we risk turning a blind eye to preventable harm. We risk undermining one of the most successful public health interventions in human history. We risk failing those who trusted us to care.

This World Immunisation Week it is a matter of urgency and priority that every policymaker, every care professional, every family member: reclaim the societal narrative. Let’s drown out the noise with compassion and facts. Let’s centre older people in our public health planning – not as afterthoughts, but as equal citizens whose protection matters.

I am increasingly of the view that we need a campaign in Scotland that is bold, inclusive, and deeply human. One that does not patronise but empowers. One that is shaped by the voices of older people themselves, by care workers on the front line, and by community leaders. A campaign that does not whisper but shouts: Vaccination is protection. Vaccination is solidarity. Vaccination is love in action.

Too often in the last couple of years in particular we have whispered the benefits of vaccination and have reduced the fiscal spend on advertising and promotion. Too often I hear the phrase ‘vaccine fatigue’ without the counter argument that you address fatigue not by walking away but by enabling concerns to be addressed and improving access and accessibility. I am not at all convinced that we have made it easier to access vaccines – in fact I think we have made it harder. If I am honest the world of winter vaccines now is massively complicated whether it is for Covid or for flu. See a recent BBC information site as an example of this complexity.

The Scottish Government minister Maree Todd is recently quoted on the BBC as stating that:

‘ “vaccine fatigue” and “anti-vax sentiment” may also have played a part in reduced vaccine uptake.

The minister said there was high uptake from children and those at high risk, but there was “poor uptake from adults right across the board”.

She said the government would “certainly reflect” in the coming months on the decision to exclude the 50 to 64 age group.

“The JCVI look very carefully at the evidence and made the recommendations according to the clinical evidence,” she added.

“I think its very wise for governments to pay attention to the experts in this area and absolutely we listen very carefully to the recommendations that the JCVI gives us and follow them.” ‘

Inevitably as with any public health intervention there is a cost/benefit analysis. We have, I feel, to argue within the wider public arena that such assessments cannot solely be based on clinical benefit alone, but upon wider sociological and communitarian grounds, and in addressing systemic and subtle discriminatory practice.

Vaccines are not just a health tool. They are a human right. Let’s honour that -together. We cannot afford another winter where deaths from flu increase unnecessarily. We must protect those we can regardless of circumstance or age. That requires consistent and coordinated effort and World Immunisation Week strikes me as a good time to start.

Donald Macaskill

Photo by John Cameron on Unsplash

Well, here we are at the Easter weekend – and on that intriguing day of Easter Saturday – lying as it does between pain and promise.

Recently I’ve been doing a considerable amount of media and commentary trying to draw attention to what I consider to be the critical and perilous state of social care across Scotland.

Several of the articles and journalists have remarked upon and have indeed used the phrase that I have shown increased ‘anger’ at what is happening. Indeed, one colleague joked recently with me that I seem to be becoming much ‘angrier in my older age’. It’s made me reflect on the nature of anger and whether showing emotions of that kind are appropriate or not.

In truth there are days when frustration becomes too familiar. Days when the words spoken about social care in Scotland sound like echoes from decades ago. Strategies are launched, promises made, consultations held – and yet the needle barely moves. People wait. Carers bend under the weight of fatigue. The system holds – just – but creaks at every joint. And all the while, we wrap it in bureaucratic language and call it “complex.” But complexity should never be an excuse for injustice.

And then someone tells me to calm down. To be reasonable – not to get carried away and constantly criticise. To be patient. To wait for reform and change and new direction.

No.

There is a time for calm. But there is also a time for fire. And yes, I think and feel ever more that there has to be a time for anger.

We don’t speak enough about anger in public life – certainly not the good kind. But maybe we should. Because there is, I believe, a positive role for anger in the Scotland we are trying to shape.

I’m not talking about fury that burns everything in its path. Not the destructive kind that wounds and withers. Not the rage that lashes out in bitterness. But the righteous anger – the kind born not of ego or outrage for its own sake, but of love. Love for people who are being left behind. Love for a vision of care that is compassionate, dignified, and real – and not forever deferred to the next Parliament, the next review, the next economic upturn. The anger that refuses to accept what is as all that will be.

This is not a policy point. It is a moral one.

We grow used to the statistics, the delayed reforms, the “next budget,” the whispered apologies from policymakers that “now is not the time.” And yet – in the quiet of this Easter Saturday – I feel the growing heat of a deep, simmering anger. Because the way we treat social care in this country is nothing short of collective societal abuse.

And when all’s said and done, I suspect that there is something profoundly Scottish about a people who will not stay silent in the face of injustice – who keep going back to the doors of power, not with shouts alone, but with stories, tears, spreadsheets, and quiet fury. That kind of anger doesn’t destroy. It builds. It unearths. It refuses to let a broken system bury the truth.

I’ve just spent a few days back ‘home’ on the island of Skye and have walked some of the places, visited some of the ruined villages and empty glens where people refused simply to back down, to be silent, to go along with what was happening. Maybe it’s the oxygen of that renewal that makes me in my own ‘settled’ life angry at the intransigence, the waste, the lost opportunity, the missed connection, that so many people are having to endure by the absence of social care.

And here is the truth: social care in Scotland is not broken because we lack evidence or expertise. It is broken because we have not yet decided, as a country, that care matters enough to act. That it is not a burden but a foundation. That it is not an afterthought but a starting point.

Public opinion matters. But public opinion only shifts when it is unsettled. When it is stirred. When it is forced to confront what it would rather ignore.

And anger – held well, spoken wisely – can be the match that lights that shift.

We have seen flashes of it: in care workers refusing to be treated as second-class citizens; in families fighting for support that should be their right, not their reward; in campaigners who turn grief into grit.

That anger is not dangerous. It is necessary.

It is the anger that refuses to accept the underfunding of human dignity.

It is the anger that sees the gap between rhetoric and reality – and calls it out.

It is the anger that remembers the names of those who died waiting

We are not asking for charity. We are demanding justice.

So let us not apologise for our fire. Let us tend it. Let us use it to forge something better. Because if we are to move public opinion, we must first speak with the voice of conviction – not as technicians of reform, but as citizens who care too much to stay quiet.

Anger, rightly held, is the voice of conscience.

And right now, Scotland needs to listen.

This Easter weekend I leave you with the words of the late American poet Adrienne Rich and her poem What Kind of Times Are These

 

‘There’s a place between two stands of trees where the grass grows uphill

and the old revolutionary road breaks off into shadows

near a meeting-house abandoned by the persecuted

who disappeared into those shadows.

 

I’ve walked there picking mushrooms at the edge of dread, but don’t be fooled

this isn’t a Russian poem, this is not somewhere else but here,

our country moving closer to its own truth and dread,

its own ways of making people disappear.

 

I won’t tell you where the place is, the dark mesh of the woods

meeting the unmarked strip of light—

ghost-ridden crossroads, leafmold paradise:

I know already who wants to buy it, sell it, make it disappear.

 

And I won’t tell you where it is, so why do I tell you

anything? Because you still listen, because in times like these

to have you listen at all, it’s necessary

to talk about trees.’

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/51092/what-kind-of-times-are-these

Photo by ran liwen on Unsplash

Donald Macaskill

As regular readers of this blog will know there are very few occasions when I get the opportunity to be celebratory or even positive these days given the state of things! So, I hope you will excuse the moment of positivity when I highlight that nine days ago (3^rd April) in Geneva, we witnessed a step which many of us thought would never arrive – the United Nations at a meeting of its Human Rights Council voted (by consensus) to begin the process of drafting a new Convention on the Rights of Older Persons.

Some of you might recall that nearly a year ago I had the honour of speaking at the UN session in New York when a vote was taken to take matters to the next step – finally (and nothing happens fast in international diplomacy) we are there! For years – decades, in truth – advocates, campaigners, and older people themselves have called for a binding international instrument that affirms, protects and promotes the human rights of older persons. At last, the voices of those too often consigned to the margins are being centred in a process that could shape global and local policy for generations.

I’ve long argued that the way we treat our elders is the clearest mirror of our moral character as a society. In Scotland, we like to think of ourselves as progressive, fair-minded, and caring. And in many ways, we are. But even here, we cannot escape the creeping ageism that lingers in our systems and structures – the subtle assumptions that older people are passive recipients of care rather than active agents of change; the failure to adequately fund social care; the absence of older voices in decisions that affect their lives.

Some have argued to me that there are enough legal protections and safeguards for our older citizens and that we have protections on gender, on race, on disability etc that cover age. Yes, it is true there are protections, but I earnestly believe that there are gaps in the law which make it possible and perhaps even inevitable that peoples and societies have and will continue to treat older people less favourably and with negative discrimination simply because they are old, and because of the acceptability of ageism tied to a negativity around growing old. So, for those reasons alone we need international and national law to be more robust around older age.

I was reminded of this urgent need when I read a report which came out from Independent Age when the same week as the UN vote they published the first Older People’s Economic Wellbeing Index for Scotland 2024-25.

This is the first edition in an annual series of nationally representative polling designed to deliver further understanding of the financial wellbeing and lives of people in Scotland who are of State Pension age. The results are as they stated ‘concerning, demonstrating the scale of the income, costs and housing pressures faced by older people living in financial hardship, and the actions they are taking when faced with squeezed finances.’ In summary it showed that:

• One in five (19%) older people in Scotland have a household income of under £15,000 a year.
• One in five (21%) older people in Scotland say the State Pension is enough to cover basic living expenses.
• Almost one in three (29%) older people in Scotland have skipped meals in the last 12 months.

‘Some groups are disproportionately impacted – with women, people with caring responsibilities, and people who live with a health condition more likely to have cut back on essentials, have a lower income or more difficulty affording housing costs.

The issue of rising pensioner poverty goes to the heart of the criticality of human rights and the need for governments at national and local levels to take action to protect the rights of older persons and to take measures and mitigations to ensure that these rights are not further eroded and removed.

This report and so much of my own day to day experience of speaking with those who receive care and support in Scotland, who feel that they are treated less favourably because of their age or are limited in career or life opportunity because of age – belies the myth that we protect the rights of older people in Scotland. The first step towards any new Convention has to be the acceptance of the rampant currency and extent of age discrimination in Scotland.  But more positively, what might this UN Convention mean for Scotland? Allow me to dream after a week of spring sunshine!

Firstly, the creation of the Convention has the potential to be a call to action. It is an invitation to reimagine how we see ageing – not as decline, but as a continuing expression of citizenship and contribution. It is a chance to embed into law the principles we espouse in policy: dignity, participation, equality, and independence.

A Convention is not just words on paper – it is a statement of intent. It shapes expectations, guides funding, informs law, and holds governments to account.

But it must be bold. It must be brave. And it must be grounded in the lived realities of older people.

Here are eight of my asks.

1. A Right to dignity in ageing

Not as a nicety, but as a fundamental entitlement. This includes access to high-quality care and support, to autonomy and choice, and to a life free from neglect, abuse and discrimination.

2. A Right to participate

Older persons must not be excluded from political, cultural and social life. Their voices should be at the table – from community decisions to national policy, from the boardroom to the ballot box.

3. A Right to health and wellbeing

Comprehensive, holistic, age-appropriate health and social care services must be guaranteed, including mental health support, palliative care, and rehabilitation.

4. A Right to lifelong learning and employment

The Convention must challenge the arbitrary cut-off points that deny older people the chance to work, learn, volunteer, or contribute. Age must not be a barrier to opportunity. We must tackle and penalise those who use the workplace to discriminate.

5. A Right to protection from ageism

Explicit recognition of ageism as a form of discrimination is essential. We must name it to challenge it. The Convention should enshrine protections in law and promote public awareness campaigns across Scotland and the globe.

6. A Right to adequate income and social protection

Older persons must be protected from poverty through fair pensions and access to benefits. No one should grow old in fear of being forgotten or impoverished.

7. A Right to home and community

The ability to remain in one’s community, in accessible and safe housing, must be guaranteed. This includes access to digital infrastructure and transport.

8. A Right to digital and technological inclusion.

In the rapidly changing world of technology and data it is critical that older persons are able to exercise their full rights of inclusion, participation and empowerment to control rather than be controlled by technologies.

Scotland has an opportunity – actually if truth be told a responsibility – to lead in this space. We already talk of a human rights-based approach to social care, of embedding PANEL and FAIR principles, of shifting from transaction to transformation. But these aspirations must now find foundation in international law and local practice.

But heaven forfend we wait another decade for pen to touch paper – we cannot and should not wait for the ink to dry on the Convention. We should begin living its principles now.

So, let’s dream truth into action and let our nation and communities be known not just as a place where people live longer – but where people live better, with rights respected and voices heard, from the first day to the last.

Donald Macaskill

It’s been a funny old week of oscillating emotions from a day in which I spent talking about how social care has the potential to be the economic driver of our communities to the next day when I gave a speech bemoaning the fact that the social care sector was being treated like April Fools because of the gap between political rhetoric which values social care on the one hand and the palpable reality of lack of priority and investment on the other hand.

But it’s also been a week where there have been moments of inspiration – when I’ve heard of colleagues in different worlds – for instance in the clinical and acute context – share insight and challenge around different and inclusive ways of doing things – ways which treat all with respect and which are grounded in the understanding that whether in social care or health we are all linked.

And so I find myself as we move towards World Health Day and Week reflecting in this blog on what I consider to be the real promise of a whole system approach to health and social care. A promise we talk a lot about not least in Scotland but have done so little to progress.

The first mark of that promise is that it starts with a holistic understanding of health. I know after all that in the end of the day and in all the conversations, committees, consultations and discussions I am involved in – that the majority of people across Scotland are not interested in whether you come from the world of clinical health or social care – they are interested in what difference will you make to their life when they or those they love most need support and care.

A holistic understanding of health is not reduced to clinical technical input but is so much broader and dynamic. That’s why I’ve always considered the definition of health which first appeared in 1948 from the World Health Organisation to be so appealing. It stated that:

“Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”

It offered for the first time a really multidimensional view of health. But some argued that it was both too idealistic for instance a question as to whether ‘complete well-being’ was ever achievable, whilst others stated at the same time that it was too narrow and limited. So, there are more contemporary and I think holistic interpretations which I like. The one that I use most first appeared over a decade ago in the BMJ – from Huber et al:

“Health is the ability to adapt and self-manage in the face of social, physical, and emotional challenges.”

Huber et al., “How should we define health?” BMJ, 2011

That definition has I think a sense of dynamic rather than being too static. Health is not a fixed state. It is always changing. There is a focus on the person and the individual and what it takes to live well not just to meet clinical outcomes. It recognises the profundity of relationships, and the conditions we live in – and I think it is holistic in that it encompasses physical, mental, emotional, spiritual and social dimensions of well-being.

So, if that’s our starting point – the promise of a holistic grounding and understanding of health, how do the systems of clinical, acute, secondary, primary, community and social care fit into this world and how do they collectively achieve this holistic vision?

Every so often, our national imagination is stirred by talk of reforming the NHS – and we’ve seen a lot of this in the media this last week – including a new operational framework and improvement plan – and undoubtedly it will become one of the go-to themes for the election next year. We will see conferences brim with vision, thought pieces and official papers will flutter with ideas and new possibilities. Political manifestos will beat with the drum of change, however unfunded and impractical.

But every time we talk about the health of our NHS, I find myself wondering – how can you heal one part of the body while ignoring the whole ? How can you address the challenges and reap the potential of the NHS without addressing and understanding the critical role of social care?

If you stand in a care home at 7am, you’ll see care workers gently waking someone who has perhaps not spoken since Tuesday. You’ll watch someone support a man to eat who is still fighting battles he long ago forgot. If you wait long enough, you might see someone cry – not because they are sad, but because someone has finally listened to them and heard their voice. That’s health. That’s care. That’s the invisible scaffolding that holds up not only the NHS, but communities themselves.

So when we speak of reforming the NHS in Scotland, we must be honest: no amount of reorganisation, digital dashboards or apps or indeed workforce and retention tweaks, no amount of increased salaries or improved terms and conditions, will ever succeed unless we grasp the fragile threads tying it to a social care system that is unravelling.

We have, I think for too long, clung to the idea that health and social care are separate domains. Hospitals for the sick. Care homes and homecare services for the frail. GPs for diagnosis. Social workers for discharge plans. This binary thinking – and believe you me it exists in abundance even if it strikes you as overly simplistic – has created a system where people fall between the cracks – cracks that grow into canyons.

A hospital bed can be cleared by a scan and a prescription. But where does that person go next? Who helps them eat, wash, recover? Who sits with them when night falls and confusion sets in? That’s not medicine. That’s social care and compassionate response. And without it, the hospital door becomes a revolving one.

So we need not just to talk whole system approaches but to walk it.

We’ve tried integration in Scotland. On paper, at least. Integration Joint Boards (IJBs), Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs), new governance models. But too often, this “integration” has been structural  – not cultural, not relational, and not felt in the daily lives of those delivering or receiving support. Too often it’s been stymied by self-interest, defensiveness and protectionism – not least around who controls the money!

We forget that integration is not about structures but about shared purpose. About valuing a care worker as much as a consultant. About giving equal dignity to a social care manager and a medical director. It is about seeing the whole person – not their diagnosis, not their discharge date, but their story.

When crises hit – Covid, ‘winter’ pressures, strikes – we turn to social care to carry the burden. We need beds? Use care homes and call it step down or interim beds. We need support? Call on care workers in the community and give some more funding for a short period to reduce the demand. And yet, when the storm passes, we return to underfunding, undervaluing, and overlooking the very system that was there for us.

If we are serious—truly serious—about NHS reform, then social care must be our first priority, not our afterthought. It must be funded sustainably. Its workforce must be respected, paid fairly, and given hope. Its leaders must be included in every major decision about health reform rather than as it is now not even being in the room. Because it is only when health and social care are integrated in vision, in leadership, and in heart, that we will build a system that truly works.

Imagine a Scotland where discharge plans begin with the question: “What matters to you?” Where care workers are not scrambling for hours and minutes but shaping lives. Where the boundaries between hospital and home, GP and guardian, nurse and neighbour are softened by collaboration, not hardened by bureaucracy.

That future isn’t impossible. But it requires bravery and humility. It requires us to stop speaking about health reform as if it ends at the hospital door. And it demands that we finally, truly, put social care at the centre of our vision for wellbeing.

Until then, any reform of the NHS is like rebuilding the roof while the foundations crumble.

Donald Macaskill

This past week I spent a couple of days in Oxford with colleagues from around the UK exploring the responsible and ethical use of Ai in social care. It was a tremendous opportunity to meet folks who I had been virtually chatting to for over a year as we all struggled to draw up a set of statements which would describe the critical role and importance of an ethical framework for the use of Ai.

I’ve described in an earlier blog the work which led to the publication on Thursday of a Guidance document on the responsible use of Ai in social care. The Guidance states that:

‘The ‘responsible use of (generative) AI in social care’ means that the use of AI systems in the care or related to the care of people supports and does not undermine, harm or unfairly breach fundamental values of care, including human rights, independence, choice and control, dignity, equality and wellbeing.’

I found the Guidance document to be immensely helpful. It is presented as a series of “I” and “we” statements in different twelve domains including choice and control, accessibility, data privacy, transparency, accountability and so on. I hope that the widespread use of this Guidance will help to ensure a growing ethical use of Ai in social care across the United Kingdom and beyond.

The group also published a Call to Action paper which frames the ongoing and continuing work which needs to be undertaken by all stakeholders. Organisations and individuals are invited to sign the statement and I would encourage you to read it.

At the event on Thursday I was personally honoured to chair a roundtable discussion on some of the ethical questions and main issues. They included an exploration of issues of privacy, of data usage and security, the challenge of addressing bias and the necessity of equity and inclusion. Indeed, as I said one of the challenges for us all is how we enable Ai to have access to data which is truly representative of all who use care and support services and all who work in them. If you are not able to share your story your voice will not be heard.

But perhaps the issue that kept coming back to my mind throughout the debates and deliberations is the issue of how Ai can be used to enhance human presence and what can be done to ensure that the increased use of Ai will not lead to the reduction in human care especially in our contemporary constrained economic circumstances. There is a very real fear that people will lose their jobs, and that the continuity of human care will be diminished. There is an anxiety that the use of Ai models and tools becomes not only more convenient but irresistible – and what does that do for both the valuing of care and its very nature? Does it even further risk embedding the myth that care is about a series of technical transactions and inputs rather than in essence a dynamic and exchange of relationship?

Indeed, I think there is a certain paradox at the heart of our digital age. As we welcome the rise of artificial intelligence into the intimate spaces of human care, we risk losing the very essence we seek to uphold: the authenticity of human connection. But I’m increasingly of a more positive view which is that if we are both wise and bold, Ai might serve not to diminish but deepen the fabric of our shared humanity.

In recent years, the narrative around Ai in social care has largely oscillated between two poles: the promise of efficiency and the fear of dehumanisation. Both are valid. But there is a third path – one that threads the ethical with the empathetic, the technical with the relational. It is here, I believe, that the true potential of Ai resides.

To understand what this might look like, we must begin not with the technology but with the individual. A person receiving care is not a passive recipient but a bearer of stories, history, culture, and identity. Ai, when framed within a human rights-based approach, can help us see the whole person – not just the task, the illness, or the need.

The work of the Oxford Institute for Ethics in AI is a beacon in this regard. Their commitment to embedding ethical principles into the architecture of Ai speaks not only to technical excellence but to moral vision. Through initiatives like the Responsible Use of Generative Ai in Social Care, and the work of its various groups such as care workers and those who use care and support services, together with the Tech Suppliers’ Pledge and the Ethical Principles Working Group, we are reminded that the design and deployment of Ai must be participatory, transparent, and accountable. It must be rooted as I’ve suggested elsewhere in the PANEL principles: Participation, Accountability, Non-discrimination, Empowerment, and Legality.

What does this mean in practice? It means involving individuals who draw on care and support, their families, and frontline workers in the very conversations that shape these technologies. It means ensuring that Ai is used not to replace human contact, but to create more time for it – to reduce administrative burdens, to surface patterns of wellbeing, to allow caregivers to be more present, more responsive, more human.

It also means vigilance. Ai is not neutral. It reflects the values and assumptions of its creators. Without careful scrutiny, it can replicate bias, entrench inequality, and obscure the voices of those most marginalised. But with principled and ethical stewardship, Ai can be a tool of liberation. It can offer us new ways to understand loneliness, to respond to distress, to design systems that are as compassionate as they are intelligent.

To embrace this potential is to reject the false dichotomy between care and code. It is to believe that technology, at its best, is a mirror held up to our deepest values. The challenge – and the invitation—is to ensure those values remain visible.

I would even go further and argue that the real potential of Ai in social care is that it can and will enable an even greater and better humanisation of care. It can and will make us better at the art of care and support, it has the potential to let us discover new and better ways of being at our most human in the exchange of care support.

Let us not be seduced by the shimmer of innovation, nor paralysed by fear. Let us be discerning, courageous, and most of all, relational. For in the end, Ai should not distance us from each other. It should draw us nearer.

And in that spirit, I leave you with lines from the Austrian poet Rainer Maria Rilke:

I Am Much Too Alone in This World, Yet Not Alone

I am much too alone in this world, yet not alone
enough
to truly consecrate the hour.
I am much too small in this world, yet not small
enough
to be to you just object and thing,
dark and smart.
I want my free will and want it accompanying
the path which leads to action;
and want during times that beg questions,
where something is up,
to be among those in the know,
or else be alone.

I want to mirror your image to its fullest perfection,
never be blind or too old
to uphold your weighty wavering reflection.
I want to unfold.
Nowhere I wish to stay crooked, bent;
for there I would be dishonest, untrue.
I want my conscience to be
true before you;
want to describe myself like a picture I observed
for a long time, one close up,
like a new word I learned and embraced,
like the everday jug,
like my mother’s face,
like a ship that carried me along
through the deadliest storm.

Quoted at https://poets.org/poem/i-am-much-too-alone-world-yet-not-alone

May our approach to Ai like good care, remain open – never blind – and always rooted in the unfolding of one another’s dignity.

Donald Macaskill

Photo by Neeqolah Creative Works on Unsplash

The other day I happened to be in conversation with an individual late in years – in fact in his nineties – who opined the view that “Happiness is for young folk – I’m just pleased to be still breathing.”

Now that may be a bit of classic Scottish cynicism, but it did get me thinking about whether happiness had a sell by date, not least at the present time when portraying faux happiness would have you run out of most social care organisations. In fact I have really pondered about whether given the week that I have just had – a week hearing stories of care home closure risk and real concern about the survival of social care in Scotland – whether because of the crazy UK Labour Government decision around Employers National Insurance or because of the crazy new regulations introduced by the Home Office around immigration – I have wondered whether or not I should even dare to write about happiness. But actually, in these challenging times I think it’s all the more important that we recognise that the value of social care is actually one which changes lives and can make people happy. That the continual failure to recognise the worth and distinctive contribution of social care and support in the lives of people is an act which itself diminishes the chance of happiness for so many people.

Why mention happiness at all, I hear you ask, well because it was the International Day of Happiness a couple of days ago on March 20th – which saw the publication  by the United Nations of the World Happiness Report. It makes for an interesting read especially in times which challenge. So, for instance it states research which shows that

‘First, people are much too pessimistic about the benevolence of others. For example, when wallets were dropped in the street by researchers, the proportion of returned wallets was far higher than people expected…

(that), benevolence increased during COVID-19 in every region of the world. People needed more help and others responded. This ‘benevolence bump’ has been sustained since then. Despite a fall from 2023 to 2024, benevolent acts are still about 10% above their pre-pandemic levels…

Benevolence also brings benefits to those doing the caring and sharing. This works best if the motivation is to help others (rather than to feel good yourself), if the act is voluntary, and if it has an obvious positive impact on the beneficiary.’

The report in its many chapters argues that the link between caring and happiness seems incontrovertible and clear and if nothing else that should validate the attractiveness of the act and profession of caring and support.

A positive statement but back to the challenge of my old friend.

For those in older age the research evidence is even clearer – being healthy requires an effort to work on your happiness levels!

We know that happiness directly enhances your mental health and wellbeing. Positive emotions have also been linked to better health outcomes and increased longevity. For instance, happier individuals tend to have stronger immune systems and lower rates of chronic illnesses. Additionally, studies have shown that positive affect contributes to longer life spans.

There are lots of things that enable such psychological and physical happiness health – and social care and support plays a massive role in this. So for instance maintaining social connections and a sense of purpose is vital for aging well. Engagement in activities such as work, volunteering, or community groups has been associated with better health and increased happiness in older adults. This active participation not only provides a sense of purpose but also fosters social interactions, both of which are essential for mental and physical well-being.

What is even more interesting is validated research that shows that older adults can experience happiness even in the presence of some cognitive decline. Research indicates that many older individuals maintain a high quality of life despite cognitive impairments, highlighting the resilience and adaptability of the aging population.

So for my old friend, happiness is not the preserve of the young, if you want to be healthy and well, in older age as in any age you need to work on it and fundamentally we know that  happiness is integral to the well-being of older adults, significantly impacting mental health, physical health, social engagement, and overall life satisfaction.

And when things are challenging or going bad, yet again we know from research evidence that it is precisely in these moments of adversity that the pursuit of happiness becomes not just desirable, but essential. Happiness is not a luxury afforded only in times of ease; it is a fundamental requirement, a necessity in the business of care, and a moral imperative in a just society. It is not just an individual task and requirement but a societal one.

When the United Nations, established their work on happiness including the day and week of happiness, it recognised that happiness is more than an individual feeling – it is a measure of collective well-being. In Scotland, where we take pride in a rights-based approach to social care, we have to consider what this means in practice especially in times when the very structures and foundations of care and support seem to be under such threat.

What it doesn’t mean is naïve escapism and an ignoring of the reality – one could argue that the intrinsic essence of happiness – which to recap is so essential for individuals and societal wellbeing at all ages – is under threat by some of the decisions we are making as a society.

The personal and individual joy and fulfilment which helps a carer to feel valued in his role, is diminished if all we do to articulate that is to utter some kind words or a clap – it requires fair pay and conditions which see care and support as an essential component of society.

The comfort of an older person knowing they will see a familiar face tomorrow, who is able to form lasting and valuable relationship and connection which dismisses isolation and loneliness, is not going to be achieved by a constant change and churn in the social care and support workforce and certainly not by a sense of being just another rotation in an overstretched workforce.

Equally the pride and professional satisfaction a care and support worker feels when they have  the time and space to build relationships, is at real risk from the obscene commissioning of rushed 5 or 15 minute visits. What does that do for anyone’s wellbeing or happiness in role?

Happiness is about purpose, about feeling that your work matters. And yet, we have allowed a system to develop where care and support workers feel invisible, exhausted, and devalued. No amount of well-intentioned rhetoric about well-being can replace the fundamental right to work with dignity.

If we are to be serious about happiness, we need to be bold enough to reimagine social care – not as a crisis to be managed, but as a space where happiness is cultivated. We need to challenge policymakers, funders, and society at large to recognise that care and support is not just about meeting basic needs but about enabling a life of dignity, fulfilment, and, yes, happiness.

For those of us working in or alongside the sector, happiness must also be about hope. Hope that we can build a better future for social care, one where staff are valued and rewarded for their vital work, where those who need support and care can access it without delay, and where the dignity and rights of every individual are upheld. This hope is not naive; it is a call to action. It is a reminder that happiness is not something we stumble upon but something we create together, through our choices, our actions, and our commitment to one another.

Because, in the end, happiness is not just about feeling good. It’s about doing that which is right and good. And there is no greater good than caring for and supporting one another.

The American poet and activist Wendell Berry in his poem, titled ‘The Peace of Wild Things,’ beautifully captures the idea of finding solace, joy, and peace even when the world feels overwhelming as it is at the moment for many of us in the world of care and support. It resonates deeply with the theme of seeking happiness amid turmoil.

The Peace of Wild Things

When despair for the world grows in me

and I wake in the night at the least sound

in fear of what my life and my children’s lives may be,

I go and lie down where the wood drake

rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.

I come into the peace of wild things

who do not tax their lives with forethought

of grief. I come into the presence of still water.

And I feel above me the day-blind stars

waiting with their light. For a time

I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.

 

From The Peace of Wild Things by Wendell Berry – Scottish Poetry Library

 

Donald Macaskill

Photo by D Jonez on Unsplash