To Absent Friends Festival 1-7 November 2017

People who have died remain a part of our lives – their stories are our stories, yet many Scottish traditions relating to the expression of loss and remembrance have faded over time.

To Absent Friends gives people across Scotland an excuse to remember, to tell stories, to celebrate and to reminisce about people we love who have died. To Absent Friends, a People’s Festival of Storytelling and Remembrance is an opportunity to revive lost traditions and create new ones.

The annual To Absent Friends festival will take place across Scotland from 1-7 November 2017.

More details can be found at https://www.toabsentfriends.org.uk/content/festival/

 

Media Statement: Joint AEA and Scottish Care conference on adult protection and human rights

Over 125 delegates from across Scotland will gather in Glasgow today (Friday 27th) to take part in a conference entitled: ‘Choice, Empowerment, Protection… Can we Achieve them all?’ A human rights-based approach to supporting, empowering and protecting older people.’

The event is being held by Action on Elder Abuse Scotland in association with Scottish Care and brings together individuals from statutory, third and independent sectors.

Speaking ahead of the event, Dr Donald Macaskill, CEO of Scottish Care said:

‘Scotland is fortunate in having human-rights based legislation which seeks to support and protect some of the most vulnerable members of our community.

Regrettably incidents of harm and abuse still take place and it is critically important that those who work and support older Scots have an opportunity to come together to ensure our protection can be even stronger and better. Scottish Care is therefore delighted to support and be involved in this event.

Adult protection and support covers the whole range of our lives. The way we allocate funds and spend our money – or choose not to – on health and social care is a human rights issue. For too many individuals today financial austerity and decisions are placing them at greater risk. That’s the case whether it is as a result of the critical shortage of specialist adult protection staff in our local authorities or the stripping out of funding to train homecare or care home staff. Both have the effect of increasing risk and a potential of resulting in actual harm.

We have great legislation and it would be an immense pity that a failure to resource protection increases the risk of harm.

The event today offers a real opportunity for different agencies to come together and put human rights and dignity at the heart of the way in which Scotland seeks to protect and support its citizens.”

Ends

Description of event:

‘At the heart of Scotland’s unique adult support and protection framework is a commitment to upholding the human rights of those it is intended to support. It’s main aims are to identify, support and protect adults at risk of harm.

Yet, many practitioners struggle with the tensions between individual autonomy and ‘state’ protection. Is it possible to support and protect adults at risk of harm, while ensuring choice and empowerment for the individual?

Two of Scotland’s leading representative organisations invite you to join our engaging conference to contribute to the debate, share experiences, and find out about national and local developments in this area.’

Share your thoughts with Scotland’s Human Rights Commission

The Scottish Human Rights Commission would like to hear from people across Scotland about their experiences when it comes to human rights. They have complied a short survey to get the views of as many people as possible.

Could you please help them by  sharing this short survey with people in your networks?

They are particularly keen to hear from people whose voices are often under-represented in policy and decision making.

Responses to the survey are anonymous and confidential. The information received will help shape the next phase of Scotland’s National Action Plan for Human Rights.

 

 

Home Care Day: Untapped Potential of SDS

On 3 August 2017, Scottish Care launched two new reports on the Scottish Government’s flagship Self-directed Support legislation.

The reports have been produced by Scottish Care, the representative body for independent care services, and highlight the opportunities that Self-directed Support can offer older people in deciding their care but which are not being utilised.

Self-directed Support became law in 2014 and signalled radical change in how care should be assessed, chosen and purchased in Scotland, giving far more choice and control to the individual at the centre of that care.  However, recent reports have shown that this transformation has not occurred in most parts of Scotland and that older people in particular are being let down by this lack of progress.  Scottish Government statistics released in June 2017 indicated that only 27 per cent of people who access social care have been given the option of how their support is delivered through SDS. When further analysed this equates to an even smaller percentage of older persons of whom 86% are opting for the status quo, likely because they are not informed properly of their options.

The first of these new reports highlights the importance of a human rights-based approach to Self-directed Support for Older People and how human rights models can overcome the many challenges currently being faced in implementing it.  It stresses the importance of individuals being fully informed and therefore able to claim their rights in relation to their care provision.

The second report is focused on how Self-directed Support can improve day care provision for older people.  It emphasises the need for the Scottish Government to put pressure on Health & Social Care Partnerships to release their hold on power around care provision and transfer this to individuals and families, as the law requires.

Both reports reach similar conclusions: that improvements are both possible and required but that the pace of change is slow, and that the majority of older people are still being offered a very limited choice or none at all when it comes to support for anything other than basic personal care.

CEO of Scottish Care, Dr Donald Macaskill said:

“These important reports emphasise that Self-directed Support can make a real difference to people’s lives if implemented properly, but that this opportunity is currently going to waste through the prevailing of inflexible systems and power remaining in the hands of professionals rather than people.  In order to make Self-directed Support work, there needs to be concentrated attention given to it by Scottish Government. This includes the need for effective monitoring, adequate resourcing and collaborative working. We cannot continue, at national and local government level, to ignore the human rights of older Scots.”

A Human Rights Based Approach to SDS for Older People

 

Care Cameo - Meaningful Days

Home Care Day: From home care to anywhere

From home care to anywhere - Karen Hedge shares her day looking at SDS in a home care context

I spent this afternoon at Scotland’s National Action Plan for Human Rights meeting on Health and Social Care, where representatives from Audit Scotland who produced the report into Self-directed Support came along to present their findings.

It was a really really good meeting; we all left with a to-do list of connections to make, ways to contribute to the recommendations made in the report, and examples of innovative practice to share. But, I can’t help feeling it was a meeting of the converted.

Whilst the report discusses various barriers and their solutions, it seems that one of the biggest barriers to SDS is buy-in.  Where it works, is where there is a committed person or persons driving and promoting it - Audit Scotland describe pockets of good practice across the country.

Almost all access to home care can be categorised into one of the four SDS Options, but often people are not even aware that they are accessing Self-directed Support. And if they were, I question whether they would be satisfied with the category into which they had been placed.  This completely undermines the Human Rights based ethos of the Act.

Whilst Scottish Care will continue to promote good practice via the work of our Partners for Integration and Improvement project, this is not enough.  There needs to be a national strategy to engage and hold accountable the Integrated Boards who should be promoting a fundamental right.  We know that access to outcomes-based care is key to the preventative agenda, and what better way to make sure you get that right, but to actively engage the experts - the supported people, in the way that their care will be delivered.

As part of #Homecare17 I responded to a Tweet from a carer questioning the relevance of the term 'home care', when actually it should mean ‘from home care to anywhere’.  To think outside the box, get out of your home (if you want to) engage with your community or further, go to work, this is the home care of the future, and SDS can take us there. We know it is because in some places it’s already happening.

Shout it from the rooftops: “Self-directed Support - our choice is our right”.

Karen Hedge

National Director, Scottish Care

@hegeit

#homecare17

Home Care Day: Access Supporting Solace resources

As part of Palliative and End of Life care hour of Home Care Day 2017, we encourage you to access Scottish Care's range of palliative and end of life care resources which have been developed through collaboration and research with front line care workers.  

These resources highlight the skills, professionalism and compassion shown by home care workers in delivering dignified care at the end of people's lives.

 

Access Supporting Solace resources

#homecare17

 

Home Care Day: The role of home care in supporting solace at end of life

Katharine Ross, Workforce Lead for Scottish Care, shares her experiences of being part of palliative and end of life care research with home care staff

In my role as the National Workforce Lead for Scottish Care I’m constantly inspired and moved by the dedication of our care at home workforce providing care and support to some of our most vulnerable citizens across Scotland.  I’m pretty much overwhelmed with admiration when I speak to providers and front line support workers about the compassionate palliative and end of life care (PEOLC) they deliver – day in, day out.   

 

A Scottish Care research project I’ve been involved with explored the reality of PEOLC delivery in care homes and care at home organisations from the perspective of front line support workers.   At four locations across the country my colleagues and I were privileged to listen to the reality of delivery end of life care in individual’s own homes.  We heard extraordinary stories of physical, practical, social, and spiritual support - all of which was being delivered by dedicated and committed front line support workers.

 

This is a workforce which, in reality, provides the largest proportion of palliative and end of life care in Scotland -  but whose voice is often unheard and unacknowledged.

A workforce which, sadly, is all too often associated with a “shopping and mopping” service -  and which is not recognised or appreciated for the complex technical, clinical, and emotional support delivered by them day in, day out. 

 

We listened to their experiences and recorded their thoughts, emotions, concerns and ideas.

 

We heard support workers sharing their experiences of caring for older people at the end of their lives, often with little or no specialised training.  One participant said quietly:

“I want to be able to explain to somebody exactly what’s going to happen (when they die).  I want to be able to stop someone being afraid”

 

We also heard about the challenges involved in having open conversations about dying.  As another support worker said:

“I don’t know what to say….it can be overwhelming.  We try and say what we think is right.  It just comes out.…you feel like you’re apologising all the time”

 

 The commitment of the workforce was evident, with numerous examples of activities taking place outside of what we may consider to be a standard working day for a home care front line support worker.  As somebody said:

“We cared for somebody in their own home.  After he died, we went in to strip the bed and return the room to normal because we knew his wife couldn’t handle doing that.  We did it in our own time.”

 

Love and compassion were palpable in every conversation and can be captured in a comment made by one focus group participant:

 “Everyone I’ve looked after….they’re in here.  They’re in my heart.”

 

I suppose what we really captured was the human impact of delivering care at the end of someone’s life, and of doing this in challenging conditions on a regular basis - for multiple people. 

 

For care at home support workers the reality of death, loss and grief is something they’re required to face on a daily basis.  Integration activities and the redesign of primary care provision must therefore embrace this.   Support mechanisms need to be in place to develop enhanced training and education and facilitate the creation of a system which supports solace - not one which commissions and pays for end of life care in the community by the minute. 

 

Our findings have been captured in a report entitled Trees that bend in the wind – which was how one of the focus group participants described what it’s like being a support worker involved in somebody’s dying journey; you have to adapt, change, bend and flex to their individual journey and to experience it with the supported person.  Bending, but not breaking; trying not to lose part of oneself in the process.

 

But at what point do front line support workers break – physically, and/or emotionally?  There has to be greater recognition of the fact that if the frontline social care workforce breaks, so does the entire integrated health and social care system. 

 

Trees that bend in the wind made 12 recommendations.  Some relate to the individual who is dying – for example the development of work which embeds a human rights-based approach to the exercising of choice and control at the end of life.  Dying of frailty or dementia, for example, should have a specific pathway in the same manner as those which have been successfully developed for cancer and other conditions.  Other recommendations relate to the workforce, and to the policy conditions which ultimately dictate practice. 

 

Delivering palliative and end of life care to older people in somebody’s own home requires highly skilled, technical and practical interventions.  It also involves providing emotional support, a familiar face, a hand to hold, family liaison and so many more forms of care and support that cannot be captured in any job title, not least ‘a home care support worker’. 

 

That is why I’m delighted to be working with my Scottish Care colleagues, providers and stakeholders to ensure more people understand the complexity of care at home delivery. 

Please take a few minutes to watch the short Trees that bend in the wind animation and share with your friends and colleagues.  It beautifully captures the loving, dedicated and extraordinary voices of the front line social care workforce.  

I’d be delighted to hear from you so we can ensure these voices are heard more widely. 

 

Katharine Ross

National Workforce Lead – Scottish Care

[email protected]      

@kguthrieross

#homecare17

Home Care Day: The commissioning cycle

Home Care and Commissioning

Maggie arrives with a hello and gets Alastair a cup of tea.  He drinks it, and they chat about how he’s feeling, they chat about his family, the weather, what he has been watching on television, the work he used to do when he was younger, and how he only likes to wear red socks.  It doesn’t really matter what they talk about, he feels valued, and so does she.  She is the only person he sees most days.  Maggie has been a paid carer for Alastair for 18 months.  She supports him to get ready for bed and makes sure he is comfortable before leaving. She feels satisfied.

Maggie arrives with a hello and reaches for the telephone. She clocks in. She used to get Alastair a cup of tea but now she knows that, as she has to clock out in 15 minutes, she had better get on and get him ready for bed first.  As she changes him, she avoids asking about how he is feeling or his family because she worries that she may not have the time to sensitively finish the conversation.  They chat about the weather, what he has been watching on television.  It matters what they talk about, but in reality, they don’t talk, at least, not about what matters.  She is the only person he sees most days.  She helps him into bed, clocks out and leaves.  She feels unsatisfied, the value is lost.

  1. Analyse – what already exists, what needs to exist, what could exist?  All too often I am hearing of ‘just-in-time’ purchasing of a service, similar in behaviour to the way you might nip out to buy a pint of milk when you realise you have none left for your cuppa.  Now I really like my coffee, but in no way can I compare that to how I value a human being.  To do so is wholly undermining and lacks dignity and respect.  Good commissioning  needs to be done with the individual, with the purpose of achieving outcomes, and accounting for both the local and national context, considering e.g. market availability (what services are out there and are they the right ones, what can the community offer) and workforce (are there enough staff, and can they do/are they supported to do what they are needed to do).  The interdependencies of these cannot be appreciated with ‘just-in-time’ purchases. Decisions need to be made around how we make sure the right services are available and paid for.  Long-term commissioning will give services and those who use them greater security which will reflect in their success and sustainability.  Long-term contracts (so long as they have flexibility for review), reduce the number of tenders which is more efficient for both provider and commissioner. 
  2. Plan – so much of everything is in the planning.  Take all that you discovered in the Analysis stage, and develop a way to implement it.
  3. Do – time to put the planning into action.  If parts 1 and 2 are right, this should be the easy part.
  4. Review – what works, and what needs to change to make it work?  Are there examples of innovation that could be shared and learned from?  I often hear that this part of the cycle is delayed or even overlooked, because the system is so busy having to respond to the ‘just-in-time’ position described earlier.  But this part is important - this is where we find out if there was enough flexibility and choice in the  commissioning plan, and if it is actually making the right impact.  Is the person receiving care being supported to achieve outcomes – ask them, their carers and the staff who support them, review their care plan.  Is the system working - look for barriers, ask how does the plan fit in to the national and local context?  What impact is it having?  Every integrated authority has a commissioning plan, it is time to analyse their impact as is appropriate – just the same as should be done with local and spot commissioning.  I agree that some of the questions raised may be difficult to find answers to, but they are necessary and must be addressed.

To proceed, go right back to 1. Analyse

You see, commissioning is a process, it links everything together, from individual to community, from local to national, operational to strategic, and the innovative to the static.  Fundamental to the process is involvement – providers and people who use services need to be present and their contributions accounted for throughout the cycle.  Call in the experts, they live it, they know where the gaps are, what is the most important, and what can be done realistically.  The best commissioning I did had a Board consisting of 50% professionals and 50% service users.  It is time to remember the importance of that process and the significance of each part of the cycle as it is key to supporting a human rights based approach to care, and is particularly crucial amidst the current context of 'more for less'.  It is time to stop responding with procurement, and start properly commissioning.  For Alistair and Maggie and all of our futures.

It is time to care about care.

 

Karen Hedge
National Director
Scottish Care

@hegeit

#homecare17

Home Care Day: Community enterprise in care at home

Julie Fraser, Care at Home Development Officer for North and West Highland, shares lessons from a new approach to commissioning and delivering home care in the Highlands

What?

  • Community Led Care at Home Provision
  • Local care workers employed on flexible contracts to deliver local care
  • Co-ordinated from within the locality
  • Communities identify their own needs and models of provision
  • Tailored to each locality incorporating existing innovation
  • Traditional Care at Home has historically struggled to provide consistent service in some areas of the Highlands

 

Why? And How?

  • Smaller, more sparse population; geography; and recruitment in more remote areas have traditionally been difficult to overcome
  • Communities are best placed to understand their own needs and to understand how traditional hurdles can be overcome
  • Local, community led services are more sustainable, flexible and can offer more personalisation
  • Communities need to be consulted and engaged with to explore the issues with provision and potential solutions
  • Often there are existing Community Groups or Charities who may wish to explore developing further services to meet the community need
  • Interested individuals can come together to form a committee
  • Local workers are then recruited to work flexibly
  • Local Co-ordinator manages the staff team and the care provision

 

Communities can be supported in various ways to achieve this:

  • A partnership with an existing Care Provider can support the Community Enterprise, taking regulatory, financial and management responsibility
  • A Community Group can be supported to become a small, community led care provider in its own right
  • A Charity can be supported to develop additional services
  • A Social Enterprise Model can be used where profit goes back into the community to further develop innovative services

 

Resources available to support Communities include:

  • A Complete Start Up Information Pack – includes all relevant legal information as well as business management support
  • Scottish Care Development Officers – roles to support development
  • Independent Providers- some existing independent Care at Home providers are supporting the development of organic community led services, they offer business support as well as help with recruitment
  • Community Learning Exchange Fund – this new fund has been introduced by NHS Highland to allow communities to visit other Community Enterprise Care at Home models in order to share learning, experience and good practice
  • Training is accessible through partnership collaboration

 

Benefits to the Service User and Community:

  • Locally led care- communities are empowered to design their own
  • Locally based workforce- rural communities are retaining skilled jobs in their own areas
  • Localised care provision- service users confident in consistent care provided at a high quality from local people
  • Flexible, reactive, local service which is person centred and community led

 

Benefits to the NHS:

  • Community Enterprise Care at Home is successful and sustainable
  • Community Led Care at Home meets the needs of local areas in a way that a larger model could not
  • Community led Care at Home allows refocus of NHS in-house service
  • Greater collaboration between NHS and all external providers has led to closer working relations, stronger communication and ultimately a more streamlined process for Service Users

 

What have we learned already?

  • Not one size fits all- each community is unique and care services must fit the unique needs and assets of each community
  • Collaborative working and strong partnership relations are key
  • NHS support the start up of Community Enterprise Models by identifying hours of work in each area and work in partnership to ensure that the transfer of work is carried out smoothly
  • Communities are keen, knowledgeable and able

 

Next Steps

  • Partnership working and honest collaboration with the NHS is key to the process and to future sustainability of community led services. The process of setting up or registering a new service takes time so we cannot expect instant results- but what we have found is that when it works, it works well.
  • Many areas of Highland could benefit from community led models of care and we have an opportunity at present for communities to be empowered to design and develop services.
  • We would encourage communities and existing providers to really explore the benefits of such models of community led care – particularly in the more remote and rural areas of Highland where traditional service is difficult to sustain. We have the resources to help ensure that quality care services can be accessible and available across Highland.

 

For more information about the Community Enterprise Care at Home model, click here: https://www.scottishcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Community-Enterprise-CAH.pdf 

Julie Fraser

Care at Home Development Officer, North and West Highland

Partners for Integration and Improvement

Scottish Care

@partnersforhsci

#homecare17